Your Team Writes 50 Pieces a Month. Who's Checking Quality?

Create custom reviewers that score every blog post, email, social caption, and landing page against your specific criteria — before it goes live. Instant scored feedback. One-click improvement. No more review bottleneck.

Create a Content Reviewer — Free

The Review Bottleneck Is Killing Your Publishing Cadence

Your content calendar says publish three times a week. Reality says your senior content lead reviews every draft manually, sends back edits, waits for revisions, reviews again.

The math doesn't work:

  • 12 pieces per month × 30 minutes per review = 6 hours of senior time reviewing drafts
  • Half need revisions → another 6 hours of back-and-forth
  • Total: 12+ hours a month of your most experienced person doing quality control instead of strategy

Meanwhile, AI tools like ChatGPT are making it easy for your team to produce MORE content. Volume is up. But the quality check is still one person reading every draft.

The bottleneck isn't production. It's review.

Automated First-Pass Review. Human Judgment Where It Matters.

TeamBench doesn't replace your content lead's judgment. It handles the first 80% — the checklist items, the brand voice check, the readability scan, the structure review — so your senior people only spend time on drafts that need human attention.

1. Build reviewers for each content type

Blog Post Reviewer: readability (25%), brand voice (30%), structure (25%), CTA effectiveness (20%). Email Reviewer: subject line quality, personalization, clarity, call-to-action.

2. Writers self-review before submitting

Writers paste their draft into the reviewer. See a score. Read the feedback. Click "Improve" if below 75. Submit only when it passes the quality gate.

3. Content leads review what matters

Instead of reading 12 drafts a month, your content lead reviews scores and focuses on content that failed the quality gate or needs strategic direction.

4. Track quality over time

Score Trends dashboard shows average scores going up, pass rates improving, and which content types consistently score low.

What This Looks Like in Practice

Marketing team of 6 — 1 content lead, 3 writers, 2 freelancers. Publishing 12 blog posts and 20 social posts per month.

Before TeamBench

  • ✕Content lead manually reviews all 32 pieces → 16+ hours/month
  • ✕Freelancer quality varies wildly → 2-3 rounds of revisions per piece
  • ✕No consistent scoring → quality is subjective
  • ✕Brand voice drifts between writers

After TeamBench

  • Writers self-review against 3 custom reviewers → only 75+ reaches content lead
  • Average review cycles drop from 2.5 to 1.2 per piece
  • Content lead review time drops to 4-5 hours/month
  • Score trends show weekly improvement

Content lead reclaims 11+ hours per month. Quality is measurable, consistent, and improving.

Key Features

Custom reviewers per content typeDifferent criteria for blogs vs. emails vs. social. One tool for all.
Scored feedback (0–100)Objective, consistent quality measurement.
Quality gatesSet the minimum bar. Nothing gets submitted below your standard.
One-click improveWriters fix their own drafts with AI — fewer revision cycles.
Score trendsProve to leadership that content quality is improving over time.
Knowledge basesUpload brand guidelines so every review reflects YOUR voice.
Diff viewSee exactly what changed after improvement — no surprises.

Resources

The Complete Guide to AI Content ReviewContent Quality Metrics That MatterContent Scoring Rubrics: The Definitive GuideFree Readability Checker

Stop Being the Bottleneck. Start Scoring.

Create your first content reviewer in five minutes. Set your criteria. Let your team self-review. Reclaim your time for strategy.

Create a Content Reviewer — Free

No credit card required · Custom scoring criteria · Quality gates included