Regulatory Content Reviewed Against Policy. Every Time.

Create compliance reviewers that score communications against your specific regulatory requirements. Quality gates enforce minimum standards. PDF reports document the review. Nothing publishes without meeting your compliance bar.

Manual Compliance Review Doesn't Scale

Your compliance team reviews every piece of external-facing content. Product updates, marketing materials, client communications, website copy, social media posts — everything needs a compliance check.

The problem isn't the standard. It's the throughput.

  • Your compliance officer reviews 30–50 pieces per month
  • Each takes 20–45 minutes — reading, cross-referencing policies, flagging issues
  • Marketing waits 3–5 business days for compliance sign-off
  • When volume spikes, the queue backs up for weeks
  • Mistakes happen when fatigued reviewers rush through a backlog

And the cost of getting it wrong is real. A non-compliant claim is a regulatory risk, a potential fine, a legal liability.

Automated First-Pass. Human Sign-Off Where It Counts.

TeamBench doesn't replace your compliance team. It gives them a first-pass filter that catches 80% of common issues before a human ever sees the document.

1. Create compliance reviewers

Financial services: regulatory disclosure accuracy (30%), risk warning placement (25%), claims substantiation (25%), prohibited language (20%).

2. Upload compliance policies to knowledge bases

Regulatory policies, approved terminology lists, prohibited phrases — the reviewer checks against YOUR policies.

3. Quality gates enforce minimum standards

Set the compliance reviewer's quality gate at 90. Content scoring below gets a FAIL badge — it doesn't move forward.

4. Writers fix common issues themselves

Marketing sees specific issues like "Risk warning is buried below the CTA — move above." They fix it and re-score.

5. PDF reports for audit trails

Every review generates a PDF report. Attach it to compliance records. Show auditors documented quality checks.

What This Looks Like in Practice

Financial services firm. Compliance team of 2. Marketing team of 6. Publishing 40 pieces of content per month.

Before TeamBench

  • Both compliance officers review all 40 pieces → 30+ hours/month combined
  • Marketing waits 3–5 days for compliance feedback → publishing delays
  • 60% of submissions have common issues
  • No audit trail beyond email threads
  • Volume spikes create 2-week backlogs

After TeamBench

  • Financial compliance reviewer with 4 criteria + 90-point quality gate
  • Marketing self-reviews before submitting → common issues caught at source
  • Only 15% of submissions need compliance team attention (down from 100%)
  • PDF reports attached to every approved piece → full audit trail
  • Turnaround drops from 3–5 days to same-day for content scoring 90+

Compliance team reclaims 22+ hours/month. Marketing publishes faster. Audit trail is documented. Risk drops significantly.

Key Features

Custom compliance criteriaScore against YOUR regulatory requirements — not generic grammar checking.
Knowledge basesUpload compliance policies and approved language. Every review reflects your rules.
Quality gatesHard pass/fail at your minimum compliance standard. Nothing slides through.
PDF reportsDocumented quality reports for audit trails. Every review is on record.
Score trendsTrack compliance scores over time. Show auditors quality is improving.
Panel reviewsCheck brand voice AND compliance AND readability in one submission.
Diff viewSee exactly what changed when content is revised — important for compliance documentation.

Compliance Review That Scales With Your Content

Create a compliance reviewer. Upload your policies. Set the quality gate. Let writers catch common issues before they reach your desk.

No credit card required · 15 compliance templates included · PDF audit reports